8 weeks pregnant

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

torsdag 19 oktober 2006

Mammograms: more complicated than meets the eye

Posted on 19:03 by Unknown
My midwives hate it when it's time for my yearly checkup because we get into a gigantic fight about mammograms, which they believe everyone should get starting in your late thirties. The last two times I was in, I said, "haven't you read the studies that show little difference in outcome between people who do and don't have mammograms AND the slight increase in cancer in people who have yearly ones--possibly because the radiation involved promotes tumors?"

In the aftermath of my most recent checkup, the midwife even said, "Could you, uh, not be so loud and not talk about it in front of the other patients?"

Why not? I think being informed in one's healthcare decisions is prudent, but more often than not, healthcare providers see anyone who doesn't meekly and unthinkingly obey as a pain in the ass. From the BBC:
Lead researcher Dr Peter Gotzsche, of the Nordic Cochrane Centre, said: "Women invited to screening should be fully informed of both benefits and harm.

"When screening advocates and their organisations produce information materials, they generally emphasise the benefits and omit information on the major harms.

"This needs to be corrected to ensure that women can give genuinely informed consent before joining a screening programme."

In 2001, the same authors concluded there was no convincing evidence that screening programmes reduce mortality from the disease.
Not to mention: They also revealed a further 200 women out of every 2,000 experienced distress and anxiety because of false positives - a result that indicated a cancer was present but was later found to be wrong.

I'm not saying that mammograms are completely useless--they DO detect cancers. But for every one person whose life is prolonged, 10 people will have unecessary (and perhaps life shortening--think of stress, invasive surgery, toxic chemo/radiation) treatment.

And I'm not making recommendations to others, but letting your know that I myself am opting out of getting my boobs mushed for no good reason. I'd rather spend that time taking a walk in the fresh air.

tags technorati : mammograms breasts health cancer
Skicka med e-postBlogThis!Dela på XDela på Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Senaste inlägg Äldre inlägg Startsida

0 kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar

Prenumerera på: Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Korean adoption: domestic adoptions going up?
    There is a growing movement in Korea to encourage domestic, instead of foreign, adoption. This could be a welcome trend. I still think the...
  • 'Lab-made sperm' fertility hope
    (image: BBC) To go with the earlier post about the artificial womb . Now, we're finally almost at the point where we can remove humans ...
  • Mammograms: more complicated than meets the eye
    My midwives hate it when it's time for my yearly checkup because we get into a gigantic fight about mammograms, which they believe every...
  • Consume for the cause?
    Yesterday we spoke of breast cancer, which made me think about how I never understood how buying some chemical-laden lipstick with a pink ri...
  • The Occasional CELEBRITY FERTILITY column: Madonna adopts a "Colorful" Child
    In an earlier post I wrote about how according to the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, Angelina Jolie's adoption of a child from E...
  • Red Seaweed as HPV/cervical cancer preventative
    The Triple Helix is a magazine of young scientists/med students/etc. that's published here at Brown, and I find it really well done and...
  • REVIEW: Pangea Organics toner
    For those of you who love citrus but don't want to take the time to make the lovely citrus toner , check out Pangea Organic's Rosem...
  • Review: Living Harvest Hemp Oil
    My beady little eyes always light up when a company goes to the trouble to put their products in glass--yes! Living Harvest makes a raw, e...
  • Adoption and Fertility
    Last night on the panel, interestingly, the two adoptive parents tried to conceive, decided they were infertile, then turned to internationa...
  • Fluorescent Bulbs--good outweighs bad???
    You know how I feel about mercury and other heavy metals. The so-called "small" amounts sure sdo add up when it's come at...

Categories

  • big pharma
  • big pharma legislation supplements compounded medicine lobbyists
  • chickenpox
  • Gardasil
  • HPV
  • Merck
  • reviews candles soy wax
  • reviews health food bars
  • vaccines
  • wal-mart big box retailers China labor

Blog Archive

  • ►  2007 (144)
    • ►  september (5)
    • ►  augusti (15)
    • ►  juli (17)
    • ►  juni (10)
    • ►  maj (15)
    • ►  april (20)
    • ►  mars (21)
    • ►  februari (20)
    • ►  januari (21)
  • ▼  2006 (227)
    • ►  december (21)
    • ►  november (21)
    • ▼  oktober (17)
      • 'Lab-made sperm' fertility hope
      • Adoption and Fertility
      • For Local Yokels: Transracial Adoption Discussion ...
      • The Downward Flow...
      • Father: I didn't want Madonna adoption - CNN.com
      • Review: Living Harvest Hemp Oil
      • Africa's Poor Had The Best Week Ever
      • Consume for the cause?
      • Mammograms: more complicated than meets the eye
      • The Occasional CELEBRITY FERTILITY column: Madonna...
      • Review: Excalibur Dehydrator
      • The Artificial Womb
      • The Good News, the Bad News (More Acupuncture Stor...
      • Happy (?) Columbus Day
      • Red Seaweed as HPV/cervical cancer preventative
      • Acupuncture Stories
      • Milk Chug on Train
    • ►  september (25)
    • ►  augusti (24)
    • ►  juli (32)
    • ►  juni (35)
    • ►  maj (40)
    • ►  april (12)
Använder Blogger.

Om mig

Unknown
Visa hela min profil