8 weeks pregnant

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

tisdag 8 maj 2007

Change in official guidelines on Mammography and Women aged 40-49

Posted on 12:42 by Unknown
Usually the alternative community catches wind of these things first and mammography is no exception!

The fact that there is a downside to mammography has not been readily explored, but now the American College of Physicians is smelling the coffee:

The American College of Physicians (ACP) recommends tailoring the decision about screening for breast cancer in women aged 40 to 49 years based on the woman's concerns about mammography and breast cancer and her risk for breast cancer because of the associated benefits and risks for this age group. The new guidelines appear in the April 3 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine, along with a background review article, an editorial, and a patient summary.

Available evidence suggests that breast cancer risk, and therefore the benefit of screening mammography, is not evenly distributed in women between the ages of 40 and 49 years. When weighing the possible benefits and harms of screening mammography, one must therefore consider individual risk for breast cancer, as well as susceptibility to and concerns regarding the harms of screening.

"We designed our screening mammography guideline based on scientific evidence," Lynne Kirk, MD, FACP, president of the ACP, said in a news release. "It will empower women between the ages of 40 and 49 to become part of the decision-making process and to encourage them to discuss with their physicians the benefits and risks of mammograms.... If a woman between the ages of 40 and 49 decides not to have a mammogram, she and her doctor should re-address the issue every one to two years."

Following a rigorous process based on extensive review of available scientific evidence, the ACP panel developed evidence-based guidelines rather than expert-opinion or consensus guidelines. In addition to articles reporting findings from the original mammography trials, the ACP panel reviewed 117 studies concerning the risks and benefits of mammography screening for women between the ages of 40 and 49 years.

The ACP panel concludes that evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against screening all women in this age group for breast cancer. The guidelines recommend that women discuss breast cancer screening with their primary care clinician and make the decision that best suits their specific risks and individual preferences.

"It is important to tailor the decision of screening mammography by discussing the benefits and risks with a woman, addressing her concerns, and making it a joint decision between her and her physician," says lead author Amir Qaseem, MD, PhD, MHA, from the Medical Education and Publishing Division at ACP.

Read the entire report here.

Read some previous cautionary posts on mammography for which some readers are giving me some crap! (here's another one)
Skicka med e-postBlogThis!Dela på XDela på Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Senaste inlägg Äldre inlägg Startsida

0 kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar

Prenumerera på: Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Korean adoption: domestic adoptions going up?
    There is a growing movement in Korea to encourage domestic, instead of foreign, adoption. This could be a welcome trend. I still think the...
  • REVIEW: Pangea Organics toner
    For those of you who love citrus but don't want to take the time to make the lovely citrus toner , check out Pangea Organic's Rosem...
  • Stem Cell Hypocrisy-- Tell Frist to Cut it Out!
    The FertilityBitch is back! I'm so sick of this fake piety by Bill Frist, the guy who used to kidnap cats in his neighborhood and practi...
  • 'Lab-made sperm' fertility hope
    (image: BBC) To go with the earlier post about the artificial womb . Now, we're finally almost at the point where we can remove humans ...
  • Op-Ed in the Washington Post
    Hi folks, Did you know Seventeen Magazine actually used to be somewhat "green" in the old days? Check it out. I also mention ano...
  • Consume for the cause?
    Yesterday we spoke of breast cancer, which made me think about how I never understood how buying some chemical-laden lipstick with a pink ri...
  • Mind Fertility: 13 Ways of Seeing Nature in LA
    There is a neat article in The Believer Mag called "Thirteen Ways of Seeing Nature in LA" by awesome environmental writer, Jenny P...
  • Caressable European Hair Superior to Yucky Asian (and African) Hair
    A number of my Korean American friends/acquaintances/students have parents in the wig business. I remember in Korea, beauty salon specialist...
  • Mammograms: more complicated than meets the eye
    My midwives hate it when it's time for my yearly checkup because we get into a gigantic fight about mammograms, which they believe every...
  • More on the poor bees--"canaries"in the coal mine?
    Photo: NYTimes. CAPTION: Isaias Corona of Bradshaw Honey Farm, near Visalia, Calif., putting corn syrup — bee food — into hives. Now the be...

Categories

  • big pharma
  • big pharma legislation supplements compounded medicine lobbyists
  • chickenpox
  • Gardasil
  • HPV
  • Merck
  • reviews candles soy wax
  • reviews health food bars
  • vaccines
  • wal-mart big box retailers China labor

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2007 (144)
    • ►  september (5)
    • ►  augusti (15)
    • ►  juli (17)
    • ►  juni (10)
    • ▼  maj (15)
      • Review: Gramicci (and Palma) and Sabbatical
      • Quiz: What Type of Doctor is Best For You and Your...
      • BBC NEWS | Health | Ovary loss 'raises dementia risk'
      • Long-Term Risks of Egg Donation
      • REVIEW: Waiting for Daisy by Peggy Orenstein
      • BBC NEWS | Health | Long wait for coeliac diagnosis
      • Pop Quiz: How's your Thyroid?
      • The Dorgan Amendment
      • NYT: Doctors' Hidden Motives for Prescribing Dange...
      • Prepubertal Enlarged Breasts (Gynecomastia) Linked...
      • Change in official guidelines on Mammography and W...
      • Big Pharma's lobbying pays off--Dorgan amendment
      • REVIEW: Bras and camis
      • Mammograms Can Have Negative Long-Term Results
      • Vaccines creating superbugs?
    • ►  april (20)
    • ►  mars (21)
    • ►  februari (20)
    • ►  januari (21)
  • ►  2006 (227)
    • ►  december (21)
    • ►  november (21)
    • ►  oktober (17)
    • ►  september (25)
    • ►  augusti (24)
    • ►  juli (32)
    • ►  juni (35)
    • ►  maj (40)
    • ►  april (12)
Använder Blogger.

Om mig

Unknown
Visa hela min profil